Yuhang+and+Eugenia+C.

1AC
====At the dawn of civilization, governments operated as authoritarian states- people gave up things in return for protection. Because the sovereign could point to bare life, people without any rights, its subjects would gladly follow its rules. The sovereign could kill anyone they wanted, and nothing constrained their power. However, due to the Enlightenment, the concept of natural rights came. A legal system was implemented, authoritarian governments were supposedly broken down, and democracy flourished. That meant the destruction of bare life, which the sovereign depended on for power. And so, inevitably, the sovereign must and is creating new disposable populations- the Holocaust victims, the prisoners, the Muslims. It became ingrained within democracy- fascism became internalized within the people who voted for fascists over and over again. To preserve power, the sovereign state created a system of surveillance, in which everything is monitored closely and successful rebellions are crushed by imprisonment or death. The world is a global death camp. No one is safe- power has forced people to either oppress other or be oppressed. ==== A direct parallel, then, can be drawn between Agamben's notion of the camp AND elevation from homo sacer to an autonomous subject is only a secondary move.
 * Van Munster, 14** – Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) and teaches security studies at the Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark (Rens, "The War on Terrorism: When the Exception Becomes the Rule", Danish Institute for International Studies, p. 146-152)//roetlin

Any direct resistance will be coopted- surveillance is the sovereign's invisible hand that monitors everything- Anything that poses an actual risk to its power is destroyed
Technologies of Control There can be little doubt that we are living today in a AND of power and a new logic of politics that must be critically analysed.
 * Newman '9** (Saul Newman, Professor of Political Theory@ ULondon, "Politics in the Age of Control", Deleuze and New Technology, ed. Mark Poster, pg 105-107, wcp)

====The resolution forces us to conform to the norm- in this it is a form of surveillance, a method of making us lose any ability to question, to act- leads to endless ressentiment and microfascist violence if we abide by it==== According to Nietzsche, the "subject" is Socratic culture's most central, durable AND 117-18, 213, 288-89, 303-4).
 * Antonio '95** (Robert Antonio, PhD from Notre Dame, "Nietzsche's antisociology: Subjectified Culture and the End of History", JSTOR, wcp)

Power has moved on from economic authority- it has flourished into the very control of life itself- the political cannot be reduced into the economic and attempting to do so only masks fascism
Economic Reductionism The anarchist critique of technology, science, and party hierarchies points to AND subjectivity. This moral place will be the subject of the next chapter.
 * Newman '1** (Saul Newman, Professor of Political Theory@ ULondon, "FROM BAKUNIN TO LACAN: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power", pg 31-34, wcp)

The state is incurable- it indoctrinates you to either oppress others or become oppressed- it's fascism is becoming engrained within individuals
During the past few decades, some scholars have followed the intellectual lead of prisoners AND , "All of it is now, it is always now."62
 * Dillon 13** assistant professor of Queer Studies, holds a B.A. from the University of Iowa and a Ph.D. in American Studies with a minor in Critical Feminist and Sexuality Studies from the University of Minnesota. (Stephen, "Fugitive Life: Race, Gender, and the Rise of the Neoliberal-Carceral State ",A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, May 2013 //SRSL)

====Not transgressing the law nor assimilating, we choose to completely ignore it and take on the path of fugitivity, the subject of bare life with no rights and yet thus unconstrained by the threat of a state of exception- this is the only way to form new paths of subjectivity==== The path to the wild beyond is paved with refusal. In The Undercommons if AND distinction between noise and music, chatter and knowledge, pain and truth.
 * Halberstam, 13** (Judith Halberstam, also known as Jack Halberstam, is the Professor of English and Director of The Center for Feminist Research at University of Southern California. "The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study: Stefano Harney and Fred Moten)

Traditional politics fail- Aff is key to break free
Politics in Search of a People When discussing the new society of control, Deleuze AND - a new collective politics based on the people and its radical potential.
 * Newman '9** (Saul Newman, Professor of Political Theory@ ULondon, "Politics in the Age of Control", Deleuze and New Technology, ed. Mark Poster, pg 115-120, wcp)

And so we choose the undercommons- a space deemed to be 'criminal' and 'unprofessional'—but it is only in this space that the fugitive can find refuge to create resistance to the university
Perhaps the biopower of the Enlightenment know this, or perhaps it is just reacting AND lifelong learning, students will return having successfully diagnosed themselves as the problem.
 * Moten, UC Riverside Department of English professor, and Harney, Singapore Management University professor, 2004** (Fred and Stefano, "The University and the Undercommons: Seven Theses," Social Text, Vol. 22, No. 2, Summer 2004, p. 103-104, ProjectMUSE, IC)

====Affirm for opening up the undercommons and recognizing we are all bare life and creating political identities from that point- the destruction of sovereignty is only possible by finding political life within bare life==== This imperative leads Agamben to construct an alternative account of politics. Since sovereign power AND yet is rendered different by the removal of the transcendent moment of sovereignty.
 * Robinson '11** (Andrew, Political Theorist, Activist Based in the UK and research fellow affiliated to the Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ), University of Nottingham, "Giorgio Agamben: Destroying Sovereignty", January 21th, https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/in-theory-giorgio-agamben-destroying-sovereignty/, wcp)

The aff is a key starting point to any possible politics- without becoming fugitives, our politics are doomed to fail
Foucault's death kept him from showing how he would have developed the concept and study AND and, at the same time, return thought to its practical calling.
 * Agamben, 1998** – professor of philosophy at the College International de Philosophie in Paris (Giorgio, "Homo Sacer", Stanford University Press, p. 10)//roetlin