Max+and+Wesley

=Classic KM Lab - Max Wilson and Wesley Wilson - Cyborgs Aff= toc
 * The revolution will not be tweeted **
 * (but if it is, please use this hashtag) **
 * If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear **
 * (except drones) **
 * Encryption works **
 * (except when it doesn't, in which case you're fucked) **
 * Everyone has the right to freedom of speech **
 * (except terrorists, and we'll decide who's a terrorist **
 * thank you very much **
 * and well, frankly, anyone whose politics we don't like) **
 * Harassment will not be tolerated **
 * (unless it comes from us) **
 * Lean in! **
 * (so they can see your cleavage better) **
 * Check this box if you agree with the terms and conditions **
 * (which we know you didn't read) **
 * We will not share any of your personal information **
 * (well, you know, except with the NSA and GCHQ and maybe the Mossad) **
 * Rest assured, your data is safe with us. ** ****[1]****

// No spectacular fin-de-siecle for us contemporary statistical units. __No theatrical__// //__AND__// // . __I miss the sublime, **as we plunge headlong into the ridiculous**.__//
 * Rosi Braidotti elucidates our position with an ode to the past, when 1ac’s began with inherency and debaters (or at least judges) had some semblance of an idea what was going on: **
 * Braidotti 96** [Rosi, Philosopher and Distinguished University Professor at Utrecht University as well as director of the Centre for the Humanities in Utrecht, “Cyberfeminism with a difference,” 1996, [] ] //khirn//

//** Plunging headlong into the ridiculous, we come to the topic of the resolution, which asks us to draw clear lines between government surveillance and non-government surveillance, watcher and watched --- those pitiful attempts to demarcate person from machine represents the law’s utter failure to recognize that we are already becoming cyborgs **// //**Wittes and Chong 14** [Benjamin, senior fellow in Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution, co-founded and is the editor-in-chief of the Lawfare blog, and Jane, 2014 graduate of Yale Law School, where she was an editor of the Yale Law Journal, “Our Cyborg Future: Law and Policy Implications,” September 2014, Brookings Institution, [] ]// khirn There is, however, another way to think about all of this: __what__ __AND__ not yet Terminators— __at least a **little more integrated with our machines**__.

__A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a__ __AND__ unfaithful to their origins. Their fathers, after all, are inessential.
 * Instead, we refuse to take sides in the border war between organism and machine, and instead affirm the pleasure one finds in the confusion of boundaries in an effort to contribute to utopian tradition of imagining a world without gender, genesis, or end. Say it with me: we are cyborgs! **
 * Haraway 85** (Diana Haraway, Ph.D. in Biology Researches gender and primatology. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, orig. published 1985, Socialist Review republished 2000. Pages 291-293, Yung Jung)

// Last, but not least, __postmodernity is about a new and perversely fruitful alliance__// //__AND__// //__ Anderson and Cindy Sherman. They are the ideal travel companions in postmodernity. __//
 * This affirmation of our cyborg nature reflects the societal shift from panoptic regimes of surveillance toward more complex apparatuses of control. The 1ac’s perversely fruitful alliance between technology, philosophy, and art seeks to strip away nostalgia for a time before cyborgs, or a time before K affs, in favor of an ethics of ludic self-awareness that embraces the ontological insecurity inherent in confronting the future **
 * Braidotti 96** [Rosi, Philosopher and Distinguished University Professor at Utrecht University as well as director of the Centre for the Humanities in Utrecht, “Cyberfeminism with a difference,” 1996, [] ] //khirn//

//** “My partner and I wrote this 1ac together. Since each of us were several, there was already quite a crowd.” Our ontogentic understanding of becoming-cyborg theorizes ourselves as multiple sets of embodied positions – that paradox enables the contestation of metaphysical binaries that produce and maintain hegemonic masculinity, compulsory heterosexuality, and the melancholy cynicism of ressentiment that stifles contemporary political possibilities. Moreover, the joyful resistance of the 1ac opens up possibilities for challenging both the gaze of surveillance and the immiseration and commodification of billions around the globe. **// //**Braidotti 96** [Rosi, Philosopher and Distinguished University Professor at Utrecht University as well as director of the Centre for the Humanities in Utrecht, “Cyberfeminism with a difference,” 1996, [] ]// khirn I would like to suggest as a consequence __that it is more adequate to speak__ __AND__ to challenge the in-built assumption of visual superiority which it carries.

//__The first thing a feminist critic can do is to acknowledge the aporias and the__// //__AND__// //__It is time for history and the unconscious to strike a new deal__. //
 * The 1ac’s joyful theorization can fabulate the dynamic flux of nomadic politics into political empowerment. Blurring the distinction between philosophy, politics, art, and fiction within the spaces we find ourselves enables a life-affirming subversion of oppressive structures and the possibility of becoming-otherwise **
 * Braidotti 96** [Rosi, Philosopher and Distinguished University Professor at Utrecht University as well as director of the Centre for the Humanities in Utrecht, “Cyberfeminism with a difference,” 1996, [] ] //khirn//

//** The figure of the cyborg can energize the destabilizing, creative processes of becoming-imperceptible, the point at which micropolitical intensitites can send a tremor through a party line. Refuse to play the rules of the game, or at least break the rules before you play it. **// //**Flieger 2k** [Jerry Aline, professor at Rutgers University, “Becoming-Woman: Deleuze, Schreber and Molecular Identification,” chapter 2,// Deleuze and Feminism, //ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook, Edinburgh University Press, 2000, p. 60-62]// khirn __I shall close by suggesting one other mapping of Deleuze with feminist theory which might__ __AND__ , nor of conflict and irreconcilable differences, but a matter of paradox.

// Utopias are abstract portraits of ideal or perfect societies that do not exist. Therefore // // AND // //__fix queer subjectivity in order to advance a rights-based political program.__//
 * Refuse the demand to abstract this debate elsewhere in favor of the 1ac’s radical politics of subversion --- forefront the creation of a queer heterotopia in this room **
 * Jones 9** [Angela, “Queer Heterotopias: Homonormativity and the Future of Queerness,” interalia: a journal of queer studies, 2009 – 4, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Farmingdale State College, [] ] //khirn//

//** We conclude with a requiem for the future: **// //**Braidotti 96** [Rosi, Philosopher and Distinguished University Professor at Utrecht University as well as director of the Centre for the Humanities in Utrecht, “Cyberfeminism with a difference,” 1996, [] ]// khirn __Yes, **the world will end**, **my post-Zarathustra friend**. It will__ __AND__ __the female kind, endowed with language.____Just call me - woman__.

[1] Jillian C. York “Subtext”, Deep Lab page 96 published December 2014. //Yung Jung

=Neg Disclosure= Case- non u T - Should Gender Categories Advantage CP Domestic PIC Neoliberal K