Aili+and+Rachel

=Classic KM - Aili Simpson and Rachel Muszynski - Court Drones Aff= toc

Inherency
Current regs have loopholes that allow for warrantless invasions of privacy New York Times 2015 (Editorial Board; Regulating the Drone Economy; Feb 19; www.nytimes.com/2015/02/19/opinion/regulating-the-drone-economy.html; kdf) Mr. Obama’s action on drone use by government agencies is much more problematic. AND of this technology, it’s appropriate to set sound safety and privacy rules.

Privacy
The federal government is ramping up its use of drones for domestic surveillance, this harms the 4th amendment in unprecedented ways Gilens 2013 (Naomi [ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project]; New Documents Reveal U.S. Marshals’ Drones Experiment, Underscoring Need for Government Transparency; https://www.aclu.org/blog/new-documents-reveal-us-marshals-drones-experiment-underscoring-need-government-transparency; kdf) The use of surveillance drones is growing rapidly in the United States, but we AND our privacy rights in the face of proliferating drone surveillance and government secrecy.

The current legal framework is inadequate at confronting the privacy concerns posed by drones Rothfuss 2014 (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf) Introduction A sixteen-hour standoff with police began after a suspect took control of AND advancements present privacy challenges that were not contemplated when our existing laws were developed

Non- warranted drones will be used to perpetuate racism Cyril 2015 (Malkia Amala [under and executive director of the Center for Media Justice (CMJ) and co-founder of the Media Action Grassroots Network]; Black America's State of Surveillance; Mar 30; www.progressive.org/news/2015/03/188074/black-americas-state-surveillance; kdf) Today, media reporting on government surveillance is laser-focused on the revelations by AND failed to tell the story of surveillance in the context of structural racism.

Non- warranted domestic drones will become weaponized – posing unique risks to civil liberties Greenwald 2013 (Glenn [former columnist on civil liberties and US national security issues for the Guardian. An ex-constitutional lawyer]; The US Needs To Wake Up To Threat Of Domestic Drones; Mar 30; http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/domestic-drones-unique-dangers; kdf) The use of drones by domestic US law enforcement agencies is growing rapidly, both AND a domestic drone regime is the key first step in constructing that coalition.

Anonymity is a vital component of American democracy which is undermined by drones, ushering in a totalitarian state Burow 2013 (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf) Walking down the street. Driving a car. Sitting on a park bench. AND as immoral, antisocial and part of the dissident cult of individualism. 140

Econ
A recession is imminent, only growth now can keep it from spiraling out of control The Economist 2015 (Watch out: It is only a matter of time before the next recession strikes. The rich world is not ready; Jun 13; www.economist.com/news/leaders/21654053-it-only-matter-time-next-recession-strikes-rich-world-not-ready-watch?fsrc=scn/tw_ec/watch_out; kdf) THE struggle has been long and arduous. But gazing across the battered economies of AND interest rates. That would make the next downturn even harder to escape.

State regs are grounding all drones now because of public outrage—federal action that mandates warrants reverses the trend Sorcher 2013 (Sara [Deputy editor of CSMPasscode, covering security & privacy in the digital age]; The backlash against drones; Feb 21; www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-backlash-against-drones-20130221; kdf) The Seattle Police Department’s planned demonstration of its small surveillance drones quickly devolved into a AND is becoming increasingly possible //. The danger lies in it becoming the norm.//

States bans on drones crush the economy Wolfgang 2013 (Ben; Drone industry predicts explosive economic boost; Mar 12; www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/12/drone-industry-predicts-explosive-economic-boost/?page=all; kdf) Drones as weapons and drones as spies remain matters of intense debate across the country AND than $10 billion in total economic impact ,” Mr. Jenkins said.

Economic decline causes extinction Richard N. Haass 13, President of the Council on Foreign Relations, 4/30/13, “The World Without America,” [] Let me posit a radical idea: The most critical threat facing the U nited S tates AND not just for Americans, but for the vast majority of the //planet//’s inhabitants

Plan Text
Plan text: The United States federal government should curtail its aerial surveillance by ruling that such searches constitute a search within the Fourth Amendment and is unreasonable without a warrant, barring exigent circumstances.

Solvency
Only court action on aerial surveillance solves privacy backsliding, keeps up with technology, and provides law enforcement with legal bright lines Celso 2014 (Joel [JD Candidate U of Baltimore Law]; DRONING ON ABOUT THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: ADOPTING A REASONABLE FOURTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE TO PREVENT UNREASONABLE SEARCHES BY UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS; 43 U. Balt. L. Rev. 461; kdf) IV. ENSURING A REASONABLE FUTURE BY PREVENTING UNREASONABLE UAS SURVEILLANCE Speaking for the Supreme AND that UAS technology remains within the scope of Fourth Amendment protections.

A Supreme Court ruling on aerial surveillance is __uniquely key__ to revitalizing 4th Amendment’s ability to protect privacy and to stop the onslaught of advancing technologies Celso 2014 (Joel [JD Candidate U of Baltimore Law]; DRONING ON ABOUT THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: ADOPTING A REASONABLE FOURTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE TO PREVENT UNREASONABLE SEARCHES BY UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS; 43 U. Balt. L. Rev. 461; kdf) [*493] The Katz reasonable expectation of privacy test has been criticized for its AND even the widespread use of UAS will not erode society's legitimate privacy expectations.

The judicial observer effect provides a counterweight that shifts executive decision-making towards more careful procedures as well as rights-sensitive policies Deeks 13 – Assistant Professor of Law, University of Virginia Law School, Attorney-Adviser in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Department of State (Ashley S., “The Observer Effect: National Security Litigation, Executive Policy Changes, and Judicial Deference,” 82 Fordham Law Review 2, SEP) The observer effect provides an important counterweight to the executive’s instinct to prioritize national security AND judicial oversight will shift the substantive policy in a more rightssensitive direction. 156

Federal action is uniquely key Harman 2015 (Jane [Former Rep, D-CA]; The undercooked debate on domestic drones; may 1; thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/240728-the-undercooked-debate-on-domestic-drones; kdf) Today, lawmakers worldwide are sleepwalking through a privacy and security crisis. How many AND sites. Those efforts need a push and a signal boost from government.

Observer effect spills over to other executive policies, particularly when the triggering case directly implicates individual rights Deeks ’13 (Ashley S., attorney-adviser in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Department of State, advised on the law of armed conflict, including detention, the U.S. relationship with the International Committee of the Red Cross, intelligence issues, conventional weapons, and the legal framework for the conflict with al-Qaeda, “The Observer Effect: National Security Litigation, Executive Policy Changes, and Judicial Deference”, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 2, cl) More systemically, the observer effect reminds the executive of the courts’ presence, and AND in which the courts show less deference are those that implicate individual rights.

** Prescribed evidentiary standards reverse misplaced judicial deference and foster better executive probability analysis of terrorism ** Cover 14 - Assistant Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law; Director, Institute for Global Security Law and Policy (Avidan, “Presumed Imminence: Judicial Risk Assessment in the post-9/11 World,” 5 Cardozo L. Rev. 1415, Lexis/SEP) Researchers found, in a series of studies, that judgments of blameworthiness for failing AND judges from an intuitive process to a more deliberative one. [|n329]

=Neg Disclosure= Terror DA, Ex Post CP (nb terror), Circumvention DA, Foucault K, T-curtail, T-domestic, Iran PTX,