Dana-Bryan

1. The plan text you are reading
 * We demand the abolishment of gendered surveillance in airports **

2. The cites for all evidence you read, in the order you read it. Citations should include the tag, complete cite, and first/last words

We begin with Katherine Cross’ explanation of normalized transphobia in the airport:
Currah and Mulqueen 11—Paisley, Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn University, Tara, Ph.D. student at Birbeck University of London, “Securitizing Gender: Identity, Biometrics, and Transgender Bodies at the Airport,” social research Vol. 78 : No. 2 : Summer 2011, http://sites.middlebury.edu/soan191/files/2013/08/currahsecuritizinggender.pdf, pg. 6, AR—AD: 7/13/15

AND
 * __ As __**
 * __ knickers. __**

====These surveillance policies are reflective of a broader system of domination and destruction that attempts to root out difference at places as simple as the airport. The “Secure Flight” program relies on matching consumer’s genders to the FBI’s terrorist watch list. This is part and parcel of a broader “war on terror” turned “war on difference”—the result is an unending form of discursive and material transphobic violence—rejecting this securitization is a necessary precondition to disrupting the bureaucratic dysphoria that renders identities intelligible.====


 * Currah and Mulqueen 11 ** —Paisley, Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn University, Tara, Ph.D. student at Birbeck University of London, “Securitizing Gender: Identity, Biometrics, and Transgender Bodies at the Airport,” social research Vol. 78 : No. 2 : Summer 2011, [], pg. 3-10, AR—AD: 7/13/15

AND
 * __ “Secure __**
 * __ identity. __** Nikolas Rose and Mariana Valverde suggest that there is much to be learned from drilling down into the apparently more “minor, mundane . . . meticulous and detailed work of regulatory apparatuses” (Rose and Valverde 1998: 550). We have followed that suggestion in producing this very granular analysis of conflicts over gender classification in the U.S. airport.

This norm replicates transphobic violence and ushers in an essentialist understanding of gender.

 * Magnet and Rodgers ’12 ** (Shoshana, assistant professor in the Institute of Women’s Studies at the University of Ottawa, and Tara, assistant professor of Women’s Studies at the University of Maryland, 2012, “Stripping for the State,” p. 111, //Feminist Media Studies,// Volume 12) **JS-D**

. **__ Whole __** AND
 * __ suspect __****__ . __**

The result is the construction of a dominant security discourse that allows the state to wage wars in the name of isolating clear borders and binaries.

 * Redden and Terry 11 ** – Stephanie, professor of political science at Carleton University, Jillian, Department of International Relations at London School of Economics and Political Science, “The End of the Line: Feminist Understandings of Resistance to Full Body Scanning Technology,” International Feminist Journal of Politics Jun2013, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p234-253. 20p. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=88353443&site=ehost-live xx AD – 7/16/15; AV

AND
 * __ we __**
 * __ technologies’ __****__ . __**

We demand the abolition of gendered surveillance in airports
====Our security discourse is more than bankrupt, it is broken. The Secure Flight program exists not as a policy of safety for the homeland, rather, a failed policy from the mobilization of the war on nonbinary genders. You should prefer a politics of affective assemblage building that refuses anything but infinity—the attempt to render gender as a form of static ontological being is the epitome of the self/other dialectic that relies on a constitutive other to securitize against.==== AND
 * Currah and Mulqueen 11 ** —Paisley, Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn University, Tara, Ph.D. student at Birbeck University of London, “Securitizing Gender: Identity, Biometrics, and Transgender Bodies at the Airport,” social research Vol. 78 : No. 2 : Summer 2011, http://sites.middlebury.edu/soan191/files/2013/08/currahsecuritizinggender.pdf, pg. 17-21, AR—AD: 7/16/15
 * __ The __**
 * __ does __****__ . __**

Another policy won’t save us—rather we must reject dominant policy constructions that enshrine binary gender as the condition for securitized violence.
AND
 * Beauchamp 09 ** —Toby Beauchamp, Ph.D. assistant professor of gender and women’s studies at the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, “Artful Concealment and Strategic Visibility: Transgender Bodies and U.S. State Surveillance After 9/11,” 2009, Surveillance & Society 6(4): 356-366, http://www.surveillance-and-society.org, ISSN: 1477-7487, pg. 363-364, AR—AD: 7/17/15
 * __ . The __**
 * __ bodies. __**

Under the guise of protective objectivity, airport backscatter machines digitally dissect bodies that pass through them, violently dehumanizing them into data points and reconstructing them as machines that desire their own flaying. This conquest of the body mirrored the development of European conquest in the New World and reflects the reshaping of foreign territories into colonies that serve the imperialist war machine.
 * Amoore and Hall ‘9 **** (Louise, PhD and professor and researcher of global geopolitics, security, and political theory at the University of Durham, and Alexandra, PhD and researcher in geography at Durham, “ ** Taking people apart: digitised dissection and the body at the border,” //Environment and Planning D: Society and Space//, volume 27, 448-450**) JS-D**

__Backscatter__ , AND __disintegration',__


 * Valorization of faux-objectivity lays the groundwork for institutional violence by privileging the views of those isolated from problems and promoting indifference in the face of brutality. **
 * Stone-Mediatore ‘7 **** (Shari, PhD and professor of philosophy at Ohio Wesleyan University, “Challenging Academic Norms: An Epistemology for Feminist and Multicultural Classrooms,” //NWSA Journal//, volume 19, p. 57-58) JS-D **

__the__ AND __bank__

3. For your Neg for each debate please list two sets of arguments a. off case arguments and on case offense in the 1NC Foucault (depends on the affirmative--> the links, but it's the shell from the foucault camp file) Framework (MAGS lab), Neolib (corporatism 1nc), Neolib general, Cap, Psycho, T- domestic, T- curtail not abolish Case turns, impact turns (we were only neg toward encryption so... the cards from the neg file/ k links to foucault)

b. 2NR strategy everything stated above basically..