Firdows+and+Laura

The federal government is ramping up its use of drones for domestic surveillance, this harms the 4^^th^^ amendment in unprecedented ways
The use of surveillance drones is growing rapidly in the United States, but we AND our privacy rights in the face of proliferating drone surveillance and government secrecy.
 * Gilens 13** (Naomi [ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project]; New Documents Reveal U.S. Marshals’ Drones Experiment, Underscoring Need for Government Transparency; https://www.aclu.org/blog/new-documents-reveal-us-marshals-drones-experiment-underscoring-need-government-transparency; kdf)

The current legal framework is inadequate at confronting the privacy concerns posed by drones
Introduction A sixteen-hour standoff with police began after a suspect took control of AND present privacy challenges that were not contemplated when our existing laws were developed.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

Anonymity is a vital component of American democracy which is undermined by drones, ushering in a totalitarian state
Walking down the street. Driving a car. Sitting on a park bench. AND as immoral, antisocial and part of the dissident cult of individualism. 140
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

This dehumanization justifies the worst atrocities
This Note has explored the philosophical and psychological effects of panoptic surveillance and the need AND and pray to the better angels of our nature for a worthy answer.
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

Covert surveillance is just the beginning—best to block it now
WASHINGTON — Shortly after Alan Frazier became a part-time deputy sheriff in Grand AND we're not Buck Rogers in the 21st century, we're comfortable with that."
 * Murline 13** (Anna; Drones over America: public safety benefit or 'creepy' privacy threat?; Marc 13; www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0313/Drones-over-America-public-safety-benefit-or-creepy-privacy-threat; kdf)

Domestic drones will become weaponized – posing unique risks to civil liberties
The use of drones by domestic US law enforcement agencies is growing rapidly, both AND a domestic drone regime is the key first step in constructing that coalition.
 * Greenwald 13** (Glenn [former columnist on civil liberties and US national security issues for the Guardian. An ex-constitutional lawyer]; The US Needs To Wake Up To Threat Of Domestic Drones; Mar 30; http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/domestic-drones-unique-dangers; kdf)

Domestic armed drones in border regions is setting an international precedent- legislation key to establish a framework for modeling
Drones are proliferating at home and abroad. A new high-tech realm is AND of unverifiable CBP statistics about drone-related drug seizures and immigrant arrests.
 * Barry 2013** (Tom Barry, senior policy analyst and director of CIP's TransBorder Project, Barry specializes in immigration policy, homeland security, border security, and the outsourcing of national security. He co-founded the International Relations Center (IRC), and joined CIP in 2007. He has authored or co-authored more than twenty books on Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, food aid, the United Nations, free trade and U.S. foreign policy. These include The Great Divide: Challenge of U.S.-Mexico Relations in the 1990s (Grove Press), Feeding the Crisis: U.S. Food Aid and Farm Policy in Central America (University of Nebraska), The Next Fifty Years: The United Nations and the United States, and the award-winning Zapata’s Revenge: Free Trade and the Farm Crisis in Mexico (South End Press). He has also edited volumes on foreign policy such as Global Focus: U.S. Foreign policy at the Turn of the Millennium (St. Martin’s Press), Center for International Policy, "Drones Over the Homeland", http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/16739, April 23, 2013)

Domestic drones in the US are unique – other countries use them as a justification for their own programs
A new precedent has been set. Despite extensive denial that drone strikes would endanger AND drones to keep us safe. It already happened with Dorner and others.
 * Gucciardi 13** (Anthony Gucciardi, creator of Storyleak, accomplished writer, producer, and seeker of truth. His articles have been read by millions worldwide and are routinely featured on major alternative news websites like the infamous Drudge Report, Infowars, NaturalNews, G Edward Griffin's Reality Zone, and many others, "NEW PRECEDENT: ARMED DOMESTIC DRONE STRIKES WILL SOON BE REALITY", http://www.storyleak.com/armed-domestic-drone-strikes-reality/, May 23, 2013)

Those norms set a dangerous precedent – leads to global conflict escalation – especially in Asia
Taylor 13 [Guy, "U.S. intelligence warily watches for threats to U.S. now that 87 nations possess drones", http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/10/skys-the-limit-for-wide-wild-world-of-drones/?page=all] The age of the drone is here, and U.S. intelligence agencies AND . Singer. "That’s not the broader norm we want out there."

Only regulation of domestic drones can prevent warfare on citizens and bolster the industry
Drones also impact due process rights. Drones are perhaps best known for the role AND policymakers representing a broad spectrum of political views advocate regulations for domestic drones.
 * Ahsanuddin et al 14** (Sadia - principal investigator for the report and MPAC research fellow; Domestic Drones: Implications for Privacy and Due Process in the United States; Sep 8; www.mpac.org/publications/policy-papers/domestic-drones.php; kdf)

The plan is the only way to balance privacy and security concerns
IV. Legislative and Policy Recommendations This section discusses the current policy and legislative recommendations AND entities to utilize drones to protect our country and serve other worthwhile endeavors.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

WE MUST CHALLENGE THE ASSUMPTION THAT PROTECTING national security requires sacrificing the constitutional rights of AND don't have sufficient information. We're fighting for the soul of this democracy."
 * ====The justifications for data collection are wrought with faulty logic—only increasing the amount of info available to public can keep the homeland safe====**
 * Scheer 15** (Robert [Prof @ USC’s School of journalism and communication]; They Know Everything About You; Nation Books; p. 208-212; kdf)

Establishing limits on drones is the only method to revitalize the fourth amendment
V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS With the ubiquity of drone licenses among American law enforcement AND with the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment and respect citizens' privacy rights.
 * San Pedro 14** (Victoria [J.D. Candidate, Stetson University College of Law]; STUDENT WORK: DRONE LEGISLATION: KEEPING AN EYE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT'S LATEST SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY; 43 Stetson L. Rev. 679; kdf)

Federal action is uniquely key
Today, lawmakers worldwide are sleepwalking through a privacy and security crisis. How many AND sites. Those efforts need a push and a signa 
 * Harman 15** (Jane [Former Rep, D-CA]; The undercooked debate on domestic drones; may 1; thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/240728-the-undercooked-debate-on-domestic-drones; kdf)

The federal government is ramping up its use of drones for domestic surveillance, this harms the 4^^th^^ amendment in unprecedented ways
The use of surveillance drones is growing rapidly in the United States, but we AND our privacy rights in the face of proliferating drone surveillance and government secrecy.
 * Gilens 13** (Naomi [ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project]; New Documents Reveal U.S. Marshals’ Drones Experiment, Underscoring Need for Government Transparency; https://www.aclu.org/blog/new-documents-reveal-us-marshals-drones-experiment-underscoring-need-government-transparency; kdf)

The current legal framework is inadequate at confronting the privacy concerns posed by drones
Introduction A sixteen-hour standoff with police began after a suspect took control of AND present privacy challenges that were not contemplated when our existing laws were developed.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

Anonymity is a vital component of American democracy which is undermined by drones, ushering in a totalitarian state
Walking down the street. Driving a car. Sitting on a park bench. AND as immoral, antisocial and part of the dissident cult of individualism. 140
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

This dehumanization justifies the worst atrocities
This Note has explored the philosophical and psychological effects of panoptic surveillance and the need AND and pray to the better angels of our nature for a worthy answer.
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

Covert surveillance is just the beginning—best to block it now
WASHINGTON — Shortly after Alan Frazier became a part-time deputy sheriff in Grand AND we're not Buck Rogers in the 21st century, we're comfortable with that."
 * Murline 13** (Anna; Drones over America: public safety benefit or 'creepy' privacy threat?; Marc 13; www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0313/Drones-over-America-public-safety-benefit-or-creepy-privacy-threat; kdf)

Domestic drones will become weaponized – posing unique risks to civil liberties
The use of drones by domestic US law enforcement agencies is growing rapidly, both AND a domestic drone regime is the key first step in constructing that coalition.
 * Greenwald 13** (Glenn [former columnist on civil liberties and US national security issues for the Guardian. An ex-constitutional lawyer]; The US Needs To Wake Up To Threat Of Domestic Drones; Mar 30; http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/domestic-drones-unique-dangers; kdf)

Domestic armed drones in border regions is setting an international precedent- legislation key to establish a framework for modeling
Drones are proliferating at home and abroad. A new high-tech realm is AND of unverifiable CBP statistics about drone-related drug seizures and immigrant arrests.
 * Barry 2013** (Tom Barry, senior policy analyst and director of CIP's TransBorder Project, Barry specializes in immigration policy, homeland security, border security, and the outsourcing of national security. He co-founded the International Relations Center (IRC), and joined CIP in 2007. He has authored or co-authored more than twenty books on Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, food aid, the United Nations, free trade and U.S. foreign policy. These include The Great Divide: Challenge of U.S.-Mexico Relations in the 1990s (Grove Press), Feeding the Crisis: U.S. Food Aid and Farm Policy in Central America (University of Nebraska), The Next Fifty Years: The United Nations and the United States, and the award-winning Zapata’s Revenge: Free Trade and the Farm Crisis in Mexico (South End Press). He has also edited volumes on foreign policy such as Global Focus: U.S. Foreign policy at the Turn of the Millennium (St. Martin’s Press), Center for International Policy, "Drones Over the Homeland", http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/16739, April 23, 2013)

Domestic drones in the US are unique – other countries use them as a justification for their own programs
A new precedent has been set. Despite extensive denial that drone strikes would endanger AND drones to keep us safe. It already happened with Dorner and others.
 * Gucciardi 13** (Anthony Gucciardi, creator of Storyleak, accomplished writer, producer, and seeker of truth. His articles have been read by millions worldwide and are routinely featured on major alternative news websites like the infamous Drudge Report, Infowars, NaturalNews, G Edward Griffin's Reality Zone, and many others, "NEW PRECEDENT: ARMED DOMESTIC DRONE STRIKES WILL SOON BE REALITY", http://www.storyleak.com/armed-domestic-drone-strikes-reality/, May 23, 2013)

Those norms set a dangerous precedent – leads to global conflict escalation – especially in Asia
Taylor 13 [Guy, "U.S. intelligence warily watches for threats to U.S. now that 87 nations possess drones", http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/10/skys-the-limit-for-wide-wild-world-of-drones/?page=all] The age of the drone is here, and U.S. intelligence agencies AND . Singer. "That’s not the broader norm we want out there."

Only regulation of domestic drones can prevent warfare on citizens and bolster the industry
Drones also impact due process rights. Drones are perhaps best known for the role AND policymakers representing a broad spectrum of political views advocate regulations for domestic drones.
 * Ahsanuddin et al 14** (Sadia - principal investigator for the report and MPAC research fellow; Domestic Drones: Implications for Privacy and Due Process in the United States; Sep 8; www.mpac.org/publications/policy-papers/domestic-drones.php; kdf)

The plan is the only way to balance privacy and security concerns
IV. Legislative and Policy Recommendations This section discusses the current policy and legislative recommendations AND entities to utilize drones to protect our country and serve other worthwhile endeavors.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

WE MUST CHALLENGE THE ASSUMPTION THAT PROTECTING national security requires sacrificing the constitutional rights of AND don't have sufficient information. We're fighting for the soul of this democracy."
 * ====The justifications for data collection are wrought with faulty logic—only increasing the amount of info available to public can keep the homeland safe====**
 * Scheer 15** (Robert [Prof @ USC’s School of journalism and communication]; They Know Everything About You; Nation Books; p. 208-212; kdf)

Establishing limits on drones is the only method to revitalize the fourth amendment
V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS With the ubiquity of drone licenses among American law enforcement AND with the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment and respect citizens 
 * San Pedro 14** (Victoria [J.D. Candidate, Stetson University College of Law]; STUDENT WORK: DRONE LEGISLATION: KEEPING AN EYE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT'S LATEST SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY; 43 Stetson L. Rev. 679; kdf)

The federal government is ramping up its use of drones for domestic surveillance, this harms the 4^^th^^ amendment in unprecedented ways
The use of surveillance drones is growing rapidly in the United States, but we AND our privacy rights in the face of proliferating drone surveillance and government secrecy.
 * Gilens 13** (Naomi [ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project]; New Documents Reveal U.S. Marshals’ Drones Experiment, Underscoring Need for Government Transparency; https://www.aclu.org/blog/new-documents-reveal-us-marshals-drones-experiment-underscoring-need-government-transparency; kdf)

The current legal framework is inadequate at confronting the privacy concerns posed by drones
Introduction A sixteen-hour standoff with police began after a suspect took control of AND present privacy challenges that were not contemplated when our existing laws were developed.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

Anonymity is a vital component of American democracy which is undermined by drones, ushering in a totalitarian state
Walking down the street. Driving a car. Sitting on a park bench. AND as immoral, antisocial and part of the dissident cult of individualism. 140
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

This dehumanization justifies the worst atrocities
This Note has explored the philosophical and psychological effects of panoptic surveillance and the need AND and pray to the better angels of our nature for a worthy answer.
 * Burow 13** (Matthew L [Candidate for JD @ New England School of Law]; The Sentinel Clouds above the Nameless Crowd: Prosecuting Anonymity from Domestic Drones; 39 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 443; kdf)

Covert surveillance is just the beginning—best to block it now
WASHINGTON — Shortly after Alan Frazier became a part-time deputy sheriff in Grand AND we're not Buck Rogers in the 21st century, we're comfortable with that."
 * Murline 13** (Anna; Drones over America: public safety benefit or 'creepy' privacy threat?; Marc 13; www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0313/Drones-over-America-public-safety-benefit-or-creepy-privacy-threat; kdf)

Domestic drones will become weaponized – posing unique risks to civil liberties
The use of drones by domestic US law enforcement agencies is growing rapidly, both AND a domestic drone regime is the key first step in constructing that coalition.
 * Greenwald 13** (Glenn [former columnist on civil liberties and US national security issues for the Guardian. An ex-constitutional lawyer]; The US Needs To Wake Up To Threat Of Domestic Drones; Mar 30; http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/domestic-drones-unique-dangers; kdf)

Domestic armed drones in border regions is setting an international precedent- legislation key to establish a framework for modeling
Drones are proliferating at home and abroad. A new high-tech realm is AND of unverifiable CBP statistics about drone-related drug seizures and immigrant arrests.
 * Barry 2013** (Tom Barry, senior policy analyst and director of CIP's TransBorder Project, Barry specializes in immigration policy, homeland security, border security, and the outsourcing of national security. He co-founded the International Relations Center (IRC), and joined CIP in 2007. He has authored or co-authored more than twenty books on Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, food aid, the United Nations, free trade and U.S. foreign policy. These include The Great Divide: Challenge of U.S.-Mexico Relations in the 1990s (Grove Press), Feeding the Crisis: U.S. Food Aid and Farm Policy in Central America (University of Nebraska), The Next Fifty Years: The United Nations and the United States, and the award-winning Zapata’s Revenge: Free Trade and the Farm Crisis in Mexico (South End Press). He has also edited volumes on foreign policy such as Global Focus: U.S. Foreign policy at the Turn of the Millennium (St. Martin’s Press), Center for International Policy, "Drones Over the Homeland", http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/16739, April 23, 2013)

Domestic drones in the US are unique – other countries use them as a justification for their own programs
A new precedent has been set. Despite extensive denial that drone strikes would endanger AND drones to keep us safe. It already happened with Dorner and others.
 * Gucciardi 13** (Anthony Gucciardi, creator of Storyleak, accomplished writer, producer, and seeker of truth. His articles have been read by millions worldwide and are routinely featured on major alternative news websites like the infamous Drudge Report, Infowars, NaturalNews, G Edward Griffin's Reality Zone, and many others, "NEW PRECEDENT: ARMED DOMESTIC DRONE STRIKES WILL SOON BE REALITY", http://www.storyleak.com/armed-domestic-drone-strikes-reality/, May 23, 2013)

Those norms set a dangerous precedent – leads to global conflict escalation – especially in Asia
Taylor 13 [Guy, "U.S. intelligence warily watches for threats to U.S. now that 87 nations possess drones", http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/10/skys-the-limit-for-wide-wild-world-of-drones/?page=all] The age of the drone is here, and U.S. intelligence agencies AND . Singer. "That’s not the broader norm we want out there."

Only regulation of domestic drones can prevent warfare on citizens and bolster the industry
Drones also impact due process rights. Drones are perhaps best known for the role AND policymakers representing a broad spectrum of political views advocate regulations for domestic drones.
 * Ahsanuddin et al 14** (Sadia - principal investigator for the report and MPAC research fellow; Domestic Drones: Implications for Privacy and Due Process in the United States; Sep 8; www.mpac.org/publications/policy-papers/domestic-drones.php; kdf)

The plan is the only way to balance privacy and security concerns
IV. Legislative and Policy Recommendations This section discusses the current policy and legislative recommendations AND entities to utilize drones to protect our country and serve other worthwhile endeavors.
 * Rothfuss 14** (Ian F [George Mason School of Law]; Student Comment: An Economic Perspective on the Privacy Implications of Domestic Drone Surveillance; 10 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 441; kdf)

WE MUST CHALLENGE THE ASSUMPTION THAT PROTECTING national security requires sacrificing the constitutional rights of AND don't have sufficient information. We're fighting for the soul of this democracy."
 * ====The justifications for data collection are wrought with faulty logic—only increasing the amount of info available to public can keep the homeland safe====**
 * Scheer 15** (Robert [Prof @ USC’s School of journalism and communication]; They Know Everything About You; Nation Books; p. 208-212; kdf)

Establishing limits on drones is the only method to revitalize the fourth amendment
V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS With the ubiquity of drone licenses among American law enforcement AND with the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment and respect citizens' privacy rights.
 * San Pedro 14** (Victoria [J.D. Candidate, Stetson University College of Law]; STUDENT WORK: DRONE LEGISLATION: KEEPING AN EYE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT'S LATEST SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY; 43 Stetson L. Rev. 679; kdf)

Federal action is uniquely key
Today, lawmakers worldwide are sleepwalking through a privacy and security crisis. How many AND sites. Those efforts need a push and a signal boost from
 * Harman 15** (Jane [Former Rep, D-CA]; The undercooked debate on domestic drones; may 1; thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/240728-the-undercooked-debate-on-domestic-drones; kdf)